<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DreamBox Learning&#174;&#187; education standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dreambox.com/blog/tag/education-standards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dreambox.com</link>
	<description>DreamBox Learning, a web-based math learning company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Common Core Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.dreambox.com/blog/common-core-standards</link>
		<comments>http://www.dreambox.com/blog/common-core-standards#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aja</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Math Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common core standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreambox.com/blog/?p=5686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times recently posted an article about the newly released Common Core Standards from the State Standards Initiative. I spent some time reviewing the math standards and really appreciated that the standards were clear and concise. The summary for each grade fits easily on one page. The longer versions of the standards use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The New York Times recently posted an article about the newly released <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/education/03standards.html?ref=education" target="_blank">Common Core Standards from the State Standards Initiative</a>.<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/education/03standards.html?ref=education"> </a>

I spent some time reviewing the <a href="http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/mathematics" target="_blank">math standards </a>and really appreciated that the standards were clear and concise. The summary for each grade fits easily on one page. The longer versions of the standards use plain English and plenty of examples. They are also clear on when a skill should be introduced and when it should be mastered. For example kindergartners are expected to solve addition and subtraction word problems with totals less than 10 using objects or drawings. First graders are expected to do this fluently. Second graders are expected to be able to do addition and subtraction up to 20 in their heads.

I also liked the focus on base 10 and place value. I hear from teachers and read in research that understanding place value is vital to success in mathematics. It makes a lot of sense. The standard algorithms use place value (borrowing, carrying, adding a zero in multiplication, etc). But place value also is used extensively in science. Scientific notation, order of magnitude, and significant figures all have place value concepts at their root.

It will be interesting to see where the common standards go from here. Past efforts to unify curriculum and standards across states have been controversial. Some students and teachers will benefit from common standards but local control of curriculum also has many advantages. Maybe these particular standards have the right balance between local control and common, high, expectations.

What do you think? Are the new standards good? Do you want your local school to adopt them?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dreambox.com/blog/common-core-standards/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting With the Teachers on the Standardized Curriculum</title>
		<link>http://www.dreambox.com/blog/voting-with-the-teachers-on-the-standardized-curriculum</link>
		<comments>http://www.dreambox.com/blog/voting-with-the-teachers-on-the-standardized-curriculum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[differentiated instruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary math curriculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreambox.com/blog/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bellevue, Washington teachers have thankfully settled their strike and are back in their classrooms. At DreamBox we followed their issues with heightened interest, not only as parents of elementary kids and educators, but as citizens of a society that badly needs children who grow up to be smart, serious, and engaged problem-solvers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Bellevue, Washington teachers have thankfully settled their strike and are back in their classrooms. At DreamBox we followed their issues with heightened interest, not only as parents of elementary kids and educators, but as citizens of a society that badly needs children who grow up to be smart, serious, and engaged problem-solvers.

A key issue for teachers was the curriculum instituted in the past decade. The district is considered one of the best in the state, as measured by test scores and a high level of college attendance, and four of its schools are in the top 100 high schools in the country according to Newsweek’s 2008 ranking.

So what’s the problem?

Teachers objected to the scripted curriculum mandated by the district -- a top-down approach that required teachers to stick to the daily curriculum, which teachers claimed doesn't take into account individual student needs.
<h2>Standardized Curriculum Ignores Individual Needs for Learning</h2>
In some districts, standardization is being taken to extremes. I know of engaged, creative teachers who are leaving the profession in frustration as individualization is being mandated out of their approach to teaching a diverse group of learners. One fantastic elementary teacher I know has successfully taught hundreds of young elementary kids of various skill levels to read, by working in small groups and giving lots of individual attention. But now she’s being told to stand in front of the room reading a book, while every child in the room sits in a chair and follows silently along.

I’m with the good teachers on this. There must be a balance between having consistent standards across the district, and across the country, based on curricula that are shown to improve student outcomes. But we must also train, motivate and hire smart, passionate teachers, support them with sufficient resources, and then let them do their creative best to educate our children.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dreambox.com/blog/voting-with-the-teachers-on-the-standardized-curriculum/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 0/0 objects using memcached

Served from: www.dreambox.com @ 2012-02-09 06:06:22 -->
